Dr. James Hollis: Gender Psychology & Personal Growth

Feb 27, 2025

Men’s Psychological Journey and Challenges

# Men’s Psychological Journey: Breaking Down Barriers to Self-Discovery

Men carry a burden that few fully understand. Imagine three fundamental disconnections that shape the male experience: First, cutting away all close friends with whom you might share worries about relationships, children, or personal struggles. Second, severing your link to intuition or instinct. Third, having your entire value as a human defined solely by abstract standards of productivity created by strangers in your culture.

This is the reality many men face daily.

The traditional male archetype—stoic, duty-bound, and emotionally reserved—has created generations of men who live estranged from their own souls. My father, pulled from eighth grade to work in a factory his entire life, was considered “good” by the standards of his time. He supported his family and accepted responsibility. Yet I recognized, even as a child, that he never truly lived with his own soul.

Men’s lives have historically been governed by rigid role expectations, creating a form of self-estrangement that separates them from their authentic selves. The masculine experience is deeply shaped by fear-based responses and relentless competitiveness. While women have traditionally learned to cooperate and support each other through difficulties, men remain trapped in a zero-sum game of winners and losers where the greatest fear is being labeled the latter.

This competitive framework masks a deeper truth: many men harbor a profound fear of the feminine, including the feminine aspects within themselves. This fear perpetuates self-estrangement. I once had a client who, upon seeing a box of tissues in my office, immediately scoffed, saying, “You had a woman in here before, don’t you? I’m not going to be needing that.” I responded that every man carries both a lake of tears and a mountain of anger inside himself. He left therapy after five sessions, unwilling to confront this reality.

Behind macho behavior lies fear-based overcompensation. Saber rattling is always rooted in fear. Beneath these defensive postures lies a deep longing for the wise father—someone who models authentic masculinity and shares wisdom learned through experience.

The condition of modern men has evolved, partly stimulated by women’s courage in challenging stereotypes about their lives and roles. Women have done men a great service, though this isn’t always recognized. The essential task for both genders remains the same: to deconstruct cultural expectations and find one’s own path.

The psychological work for men involves recognizing that the drink after work, the stoicism, the competitive drive—these are often attempts to anesthetize deep pain that remains unacknowledged. The journey toward psychological wholeness requires men to question these patterns and discover what lies beneath.

Focused and Diffuse Awareness in Gender and Personal Growth

# Focused and Diffuse Awareness in Gender and Personal Growth

The dichotomy between focused awareness and diffuse awareness offers a more insightful framework than traditional gender constructs. As Castillejo noted, these are two distinct modes of orientation to the world—both essential for wholeness.

Focused awareness represents goal-directed behavior historically associated with masculinity. Diffuse awareness encompasses context and relationship. The former without the latter leads to sterility and isolation; the latter without the former results in aimless wandering through life.

Hollis has observed that women in therapy benefit from developing their “animus” or inner focused awareness. This goal-directed behavior moves life forward purposefully. Conversely, men must become aware of context and relatedness. The ultimate question transcends gender: What was your life about? Not the size of your pile of sand, but the meaning behind your journey.

Modern society has witnessed a dramatic shift in therapeutic demographics. In the 1970s, Hollis’s practice consisted of 90% women and 10% men. Today, those numbers have reversed—not because of any targeting, but because men increasingly recognize their internal disorientation. Traditional masculine definitions have lost relevance in our post-industrial world.

The Industrial Revolution fundamentally altered male identity formation. When fathers and sons worked side by side as tanners, carpenters, or shepherds, boys learned who they were through direct observation and participation. Today’s separation—fathers at offices, sons at home with mothers and female teachers—has created a hunger for initiatory masculine presence.

Traditional cultures recognized this need through formalized rites of passage. At puberty, tribal elders—not personal relatives—separated boys from home, appearing as archetypal forces rather than familiar neighbors. These initiations involved isolation and suffering, teaching young men that they possessed internal resources for their journey.

Our culture now abounds with psychologically uninitiated males. Without clear masculine roles or models, many men struggle with fundamental questions: What does it mean to be a man? What am I supposed to do? The essential answer—find your path and sustain it with courage—provides little practical guidance.

Age brings its own challenges. Most of Hollis’s male clients are over 50, grappling with aging, mortality, and self-definition beyond work. This life stage often reawakens the unlived life, creating space for emotional and spiritual development.

This development requires engaging with the numinous—those experiences that quicken your spirit and stir something deep within. When you stand before a painting that moves you to tears while others walk by indifferent, you’ve encountered something numinous. This resonance exists because something external has connected with something internal.

You cannot will things to be numinous. Duty, convention, and expectations are insufficient catalysts. Numinosity emerges from the soul, not from collective expectations.

In time, both women and men discover remarkably similar life goals: how to balance personal journey with the legitimate commitments of relationship. This shared human challenge transcends constructed gender differences, pointing toward our common quest for meaning and connection.

Women’s Unique Challenges and Changing Roles

## Women’s Unique Challenges in Modern Life

The messages women receive from their families and culture fundamentally shape their development. Each woman must inventory these influences and determine whether they support or hinder her personal growth. While biological differences create distinct realities—women bear children and often shoulder greater parenting responsibilities—the modern woman frequently navigates the demanding dual path of career advancement and family life.

A revealing survey of high-achieving female executives with MBAs who had reached vice-presidential positions showed that when asked at age 50 if they would choose the same path again, nearly all said no. The cost was too great. They found that friendship, intimacy, and sometimes even meaningful parenting were sacrificed at the altar of professional advancement.

This mirrors the common regret among men at retirement—rarely do people wish they had spent more time at the office. As Huberman notes, he knows scientists who claim they want to die at their desks, yet their family relationships often reveal the tragic cost of such dedication.

Men in relationships must learn that supporting their partner’s growth and development is essential. The more insecure the man, the more threatened he becomes by his partner’s evolution, fearing she might chart a different course. Genuine reciprocity in responsibilities—household duties, childcare, emotional support—prevents resentment from festering.

For women to thrive, they need partners committed to this reciprocity. Without it, women remain unfairly burdened. We haven’t fully resolved this imbalance in our culture, though progress is evident.

The historical context is striking. In retirement communities today, women in their 70s and 80s recount how they were systematically excluded from professional advancement. One female physicist described only gaining recognition late in her career. We sometimes forget how recent these barriers were—a profound violation of human potential that was once routine.

The cultural transformation that began in the 1960s represented a resurgence against oppressive role definitions. Previously unthinkable choices—marrying outside one’s religion or race, or acknowledging one’s homosexuality—are now increasingly accepted. This shift has created greater freedom but also ambiguity, which troubles those who prefer rigid social structures.

The reactive pushback we witness in contemporary social issues—from racism to reproductive rights—often reflects this tension between traditional role definitions and individual autonomy. What we’re witnessing is the ongoing negotiation between societal expectations and personal authenticity.

Read Andrew Huberman

Discussion about this post